In the beginning of the Torah Portion of
Sisa, G-d tells Moshe to instruct the Jewish people that they each give a half-shekel "to atone for your souls." G-d indicated the exact coin by saying,
[298] "
This is what they shall give...." Our Sages comment: "G-d took out a sample coin of fire from under His Throne of Glory and showed it to Moshe, saying, 'Such a coin shall they give.'"
[299]
Tosafos[300] explains that "Moshe was perplexed, thinking to himself, 'What can a person possibly give that will serve as atonement for his soul?' G-d therefore showed him a 'coin of fire.'"
How did the revelation of a "coin of fire" assuage Moshe's doubts about how a half-shekel coin could grant atonement. Especially so, since it was meant to atone for the Golden Calf, the heinous sin of idolatry.
This will be understood with the following parable:[301] A person once served an apprenticeship to a silver and goldsmith. The artisan taught his apprentice all the necessary details except for one, which he omitted because of its utter simplicity: in order to melt gold and silver and change its shape a fire must be lit under the metals.
Setting out on his own, the ex-apprentice faithfully followed all the particulars he was taught, leaving out but one "minor" detail -- lighting a fire under the silver and gold -- that his master had failed to convey. To his utter consternation nothing happened -- the silver and gold remained as they were, and he was able to fashion nothing at all. The main "ingredient," fire, was lacking.
G-d similarly responded to Moshe by showing him a "coin of fire": Merely offering a half-shekel coin doesn't bring about atonement. When, however, that coin is offered with the "fire" and spirit that emanates from the soul's very essence -- "Man's soul is G-d's lamp"[302] -- then even a half-shekel coin can fully atone for so grievous a sin as the Golden Calf.
This will be better understood by prefacing another question. The commandment regarding the half-shekel is stated thusly: "This is what they shall give ... a half-shekel; a shekel is twenty geirah, a half-shekel is to be given as an offering to G-d."
Why the seemingly excess verbiage; the Torah could have simply stated that one is to give ten geirah? Evidently the Torah desires to indicate that G-d specifically wanted that a half-shekel be given -- the ten geirah is not an amount that stands on its own, rather it is half of a complete shekel that consists of twenty geirah.
The Torah always demands that one give G-d of one's best.[303] Why is an exception made here where we are bidden to give but half of a shekel, half of a complete thing? Especially so, since the half-shekel served as atonement for the idolatrous and fragmenting sin of the Golden Calf, a denial of G-d's oneness and unity. Shouldn't the atonement offering be symbolic of oneness and unity -- a complete shekel, rather than the fragmentation of a half-shekel?
The true aspect of unity demanded of a Jew is that he realize that he is not at all an entity unto himself -- as he exists on his own he is but a shadow of his true self, half a thing. He becomes an authentic and complete entity only through his union with G-d.
This feeling and degree of spiritual service elicits and reveals the same aspect above: G-d's completeness, as it were, is dependent upon the Jewish people. G-d therefore calls the Jewish people by the appellation Tamasi, "My completion"[304] -- it is they who make Him, as it were, complete.[305]
For the bond between a Jew and G-d is not that of two entities linked together, rather they are truly one entity; each without the other is but a half[306] -- only as they are together are they truly whole.
This, then, is the notion of the half-shekel -- one complete shekel composed of twenty geirah: one unit of ten geirah corresponding to the person's ten soul powers, the other unit of ten geirah corresponding to G-d's ten Supernal Attributes. As these units combine they comprise one whole entity of a complete "sacred shekel."
This is alluded to by the concept of a "coin of fire" -- the fire of the essence of the soul that clothes itself in the act of giving the half-shekel. For the commandment of the "half-shekel" demonstrates that the Jewish people and G-d are, as it were, entirely one -- something that is accomplished through the unity of the soul's essence with the essence of G-d.
This also explains how the half-shekel can act as atonement for the sin of the Golden Calf. No sin, not even the sin of idolatry,[307] can effect the soul's essence -- the essence of the soul always remains whole and united with G-d.
When this essence is revealed -- through the half-shekel -- then even the revealed powers are affected and they too are unified with G-dliness. Atonement is then successfully achieved.
Based on Likkutei Sichos, Vol. III, pp. 923-928.
Notes:
- (Back to text) Shemos 30:13.
- (Back to text) Yerushalmi, Shekalim 1:4; Tanchuma, Sisa 9, Naso 11; Bamidbar Rabbah 12:3 quoted in Rashi on this verse. See also Likkutei Sichos Vol. XVI, p. 381, and additional sources cited there.
- (Back to text) Chullin 42a (Tosafos, s.v. Zos). See also Midrashim cited in Likkutei Sichos, loc. cit., fn. 2.
- (Back to text) Some say that the parable was offered by the Baal Shem Tov.
- (Back to text) Mishlei 20:27.
- (Back to text) See Vayikra 3:16; Rambam conclusion of Hilchos Isurei Bi'ah.
- (Back to text) Shir HaShirim 5:2.
- (Back to text) Likkutei Torah, ibid.
- (Back to text) See Or Torah, Behaalos'cha.
- (Back to text) See Sanhedrin 43b ff.